jesus Cabal          Terrorized
Advertise the facts Advertise

December 31, 2007.

It’s not us…It’s them: They are the bad guys!

  • A good “litmus test” for the United Nations, and for the Congress of the United States is whether the straight out criminal behaviour of the President of the United States Mr. George Bush, and of the vice president Dick Cheney in the cases of the invasion of Iraq, and the torture of Jesus Alberto Cabal will remain unpunished for years to come. There is no doubt that these individuals have committed serious violations of International Law (such as the Geneva’s Convention genocide, and anti-torture statutes), and also of United States’ laws dealing with conspiracy, perjury, assassination, and attempts to assassinate. Let’s not forget either that Mr. Bush has violated his oath to honour and enforce several Articles or Amendments to the United States’ Constitution aimed at protecting the human rights of all people within its jurisdiction.

  • Should this type of behaviour be allowed to continue with impunity the developing nations of the world will be getting the wrong message, that is: “That the laws against war crimes and genocide only apply to the leaders of poor, weak, and developing nations who happen to fall into disgrace with the technologically advanced nations of the “First World”, and that powerful countries like the United States and its Western European counterparts can get away with torture, mass murder, and the most outrageous behaviour that one can imagine”. If this is not an incentive for the developing nations of the world to try and arm themselves with weapons of mass destruction to protect themselves from the aggression of the “tyrant nations” who are armed to the teeth with powerful nuclear arsenals, then, I do not know what else it could be.

  • Let’s not forget that even the former CIA director George Tennet has stated on numerous occasions that both: Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney, wanted to go to war against the government of Iraq in 2003 regardless of the facts against Saddam Hussein whom they wanted to depose at any cost no matter the consequences. I am not arguing herein that Saddam Hussein was a good man, but I truly believe that in great part he was “demonized” by the American National Security establishment encouraged, among others, by The Bush family and Mr. Dick Cheney himself who was the Secretary of Defence under the Administration of George Bush Senior. One question that arises is: What may have been the reason for demonizing Saddam Hussein a man considered years ago a “good pal” of Ronald Reagan and Mr Donald Rumsfeld himself? Very simple, Hussein was a former ally against the Iranians who probably knew a lot of nasty secrets about the present and past U.S Administrations, and who was no longer of any use to the American political establishment. Therefore, invading his country with a handful of “puppet nations” after feeding the American people and the Congress a high doses of lies in support of the invasion rendered the expected result: That is, to have Saddam Hussein lynched by his enemies after a mock trial, in which he was portrayed as the son of the devil himself.

  • However, the unexpected result of the unlawful invasion of Iraq was that over half a million of its citizens have been killed in the process (although some reports allege that the Iraqi casualties are as high as 1 million up to December of 2007); Approximately four (4) thousand American soldiers have also been killed and do add to this numbers more than 40,000 troops injured or maimed and then we have to start talking also about how to punish the “butchers of Washington” for crimes against humanity. This was indeed the risks that Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney were willing to take to accomplish their evil deeds while distracting people’s attention from the real challenges facing the United States. But the problem with Bush’s and Cheney’s behaviour is that Saddam Hussein was also the president of a “sovereign nation” who had done nothing at all to the people of the United States; thus, an illegal act in violation of international law was committed by President Bush and his vice-president turning them into war criminals who must face justice for crimes against humanity if the developed nations who have supported the erratic policies of George Bush Junior expect to earn the respect of the rest of the world.

  • Something else that the American public needs to take into account is that the facts are already known that these two individuals deliberately lied to the nation not only about Hussein’s purported nuclear arsenals, but about Jesus Cabal’s alleged raped of a minor which all seems to indicate was a “hit” ordered by the very same “blood thirsty thugs” we are referring to herein. In fact, the American troops who have fought in Iraq were flat out misled into believing that they would be going to war, and probably giving up their lives, to protect the liberties of their country men, when in fact were dying for George Bush himself and his doctrine of aggression toward those who dared to disagree with his policies. The irony of this matter is that those soldiers who died in Iraq sacrificed themselves for a man who someday might very well be remembered by historians as a war criminal.

  • The Republican conspiracy against me, Jesus Alberto Cabal, is another example of corruption, racism, and disdain for the rule of law among the “right-wingers” or conservative politicians in the United States. In the early nineteen eighties former president Ronald Reagan unilaterally “suspended” my legal and constitutional rights within the United States without following due process of law. Such action was taken under the excuse of “Protecting the National Security of the United States” after I filed discrimination, slander, and retaliation charges against two former employers known as “Envirodyne Engineers” (from Missouri) and “Private Labels Cosmetics” (from New Jersey). The evidence indicates that political assassinations were committed to be able to justify the “suspension” of my legal rights by the Reagan-Bush Administration. A question that arises herein is: Who may have had motives to poison with cyanide-laced Tylenol capsules seven (7) innocent people in Chicago in 1982, as well as other similar attempts in the state of Illinois? Well, to this day such mystery is still unresolved. Nonetheless, I am sure that it was not the Soviets, or the North Koreans, nor Islamic terrorist groups; and it could not have been me, Jesus Cabal, for the simple fact that law enforcement agencies in the state of Illinois had me already under electronic surveillance altogether with the FBI, as a result of the discrimination charges referred to above which I filed in those days. Moreover, I wouldn’t have motives to do something like that since I was in possession of very strong evidence to support my allegations of employment discrimination and retaliation by my employers. (As can be seen in the section of this Web Page entitled “EVIDENCE”). Furthermore, law enforcement officials knew so well that this was a political assassination carried out by professional killers that in the 17 years that I was raising hell in the Federal and State Courts of Illinois and Missouri, I was never asked anything at all about said subject.

  • This is the overwhelming reason why one can assume that the Reagan-Bush Administrations had very powerful reasons to engage in political assassination as to create a lot of confusion about my law suits and to corrupt federal judges thereafter as to avoid compensating me for my injuries. Based on the facts presented to the Courts in support of my law suits, plus the strict censorship imposed by Executive Orders it is fair to say that I should have received considerable compensation as a result of the overwhelming direct evidence on record should the claims have been allowed to proceed before impartial judges without tampering or cheating sponsored by the White House. After all, in civil cases or in civil litigation the facts are proven just by the “preponderance of the evidence”.

  • In fact, nowadays after more than 25 years it appears that the cyanide killings in Chicago were a “hit” carried out by highly trained, military or para-military assassins with the resources and logistics to act with impunity in pursuit of a political agenda within the former Reagan-Bush presidential administrations, which among other things aimed to demonize me and to turn me into the “poster child” for their “anti-discrimination laws” campaign.

  • Now, let’s examine this matter in detail: Who was Ronald Reagan? Well, the 40th president of the United States was an ultra-conservative republican politician who became president at the late age of 68, who was also an anti-communist zealot and totally obsessed with the Sandinista army in the sovereign country of Nicaragua. His political platform in the 1980 presidential race had among the central issues to turn back the clock on the civil rights movement within the United States, and particularly to reverse the “affirmative action” laws enacted to protect minorities in education, housing, and employment matters. The political mood in the country was favorable for the rising of Ronald Reagan due to the anti-foreign sentiment of the time fueled by the Iranian hostage crisis in which 52 U.S citizens were kidnapped at the American embassy in Tehran by followers of the religious leader Ayatollah Khomeini. Mr. Reagan, who we later found out was an “erratic old man”, who scared the living daylights out of former Soviet President Gorvachev with his anti-soviet rhetoric, and his multi billion-dollar Arms build up also appeared to have been suffering already from dementia, once we study in detail the final report of the independent council Walsh on the Iran-Contra investigation which portrayed him as a president totally detached from the reality of his job. A man who used to spend many hours a day sleeping while other officials were running the day to day activities of the nation. Reagan surrounded himself with ruthless individuals such as Caspar Weinberger, Bill Casey, Ed Meese, and George Schultz, to name a few, who altogether with Lt. Colonel Oliver North appeared to be running a “parallel government” from the basement of the White house dedicated to all type of illegal activities including but no limited to sabotage and assassinations in foreign lands. These are the same guys who in defiance of Congress and existing U.S Laws were waging a secret war in Central America which caused thousands of lives, and who were also providing arms to the government of Iran to be used against Iraq (and viceversa) while calling Saddam Hussein a key allied of the United States and thereafter causing the death of hundreds of thousands if not millions of people as a result of the barbaric ten-year war between Iran and Iraq fueled by Ronald Reagan and his “thugs of war”.

  • Therefore, no one should be surprised that this type of war mongers could have been responsible for the cyanide killings in Chicago in 1982 with the goal to further Ronald Reagan’s anti-civil rights’ agenda, and perhaps to try and portray me, Jesus Cabal, as the “poster child” in support of their case against discrimination laws. It is very well known that Mr. Reagan and his successors have been “demonizing me” for years and using a stiff censorship about my law suits ensuring that only the Reagan’s and later on the Bush’s Administration side of the story would be told to the American people creating thereafter a false and bizarre sense of reality.

  • The Republican conspiracy against me did continue under the “George Bush Senior” presidency mainly by ensuring that the news media maintained a total black out of the news regarding my law suits filed in Federal Courts of the United States. Throughout the decade of the nineteen nineties the republicans also managed to continue their cover up in my case while challenging the “patriotism” of Bill Clinton the democratic president who followed George Bush (senior), and forced him on patriotic grounds to continue the cover up and thereafter the outrageous violation of my civil rights that continues up to these days. (That’s rights folks, I have no doubts at all that George Bush Senior dedicated his political campaign to challenge the patriotism of Bill Clinton just to ensure that he did not expose the Reagan-Bush cover ups and crimes committed against me, Jesus Alberto Cabal, during the nineteen eighties”). Then, in 2001 George Bush Junior came along as the 43rd president of the United States and based on the events that took place a few months after his inauguration it is quite evident that the Republican party had some nasty plans in store for me and came ready to unleash a final wave of terror similar to what his father and Ronal Reagan had started before him in the early nineteen eighties.

  • The sequence of events beginning with Ronald Reagan throughout the presidency of George Bush Junior clearly demonstrate that the Republican party of the United States took it on its own “to wage a brutal psychological war” against me in a clear attempt to demonize me, to “turn me into a monster” before the eyes of the American people and of the international community as well. Such was done via assassinations, and fabrication of cases such as the alleged “rape of a child” in the state of Texas in 2001 just months after the presidential inauguration of George Bush Jr. This is without a doubt “the icing on the cake” and best evidence so far that “Republican party officials” were hunting me down as it is shown by the facts that all the judges appointed in the Federal and State litigation that took place in the state of Texas as a result of the alleged rape charges were the most conservative and radical within the republican judges that could be found in Texas to handle said litigation. It is quite evident that there was an attempt by the “right-wingers” within the Republican Party to desensitize people and most likely to assassinate me as well while fabricating the rape charges of a child. After all, the subject is taboo and stigmatized to the point that when someone is accused of this type of crime people don’t even care to find out what the facts are, and just turn away without stopping by to think that a terrible injustice may have been committed against an innocent person.

  • Fortunately, a long time ago I realized that assassinating me might very well be what republicans were trying to do after an attempt on my life which was carried out in Jersey City, New Jersey, during the year of 1983. Such attempt did cost me the sight in my left eye, and was done during the Ronald Reagan Administration at a time that it was rumoured that Mr. Reagan had “suspended” my rights via Executive Order. As a result of this incident I took measurements to avoid giving them another chance to do me in and to make it look like it was an accident. Up to now things have not worked out as they expected, and step by step the reality of this barbaric and racist conspiracy against me is coming to light; although some of the people who could expose the conspiracy wide open, mainly in the news media, are still feeling afraid, very intimidated to come forward and do the right thing with the knowledge they already have.

  • Could George Bush and Dick Cheney be capable of ordering a “hit” on Jesus Alberto Cabal in furtherance of a conspiracy? Let me just respond once again by saying that these two men did order an attack on a sovereign nation who had done nothing at all to the people of the United States, as has been clearly explained in the book by former CIA director George Tennet, and has been exposed as well by other congressional investigations which have corroborated the fact that both of these men wanted to launch an attack against Iraq regardless of the facts and consequences. They did not even care about getting killed in the process thousands of young American soldiers to reach their evil goals. Therefore, nobody should be surprised that these men were also willing and capable of ordering the fabrication of the sexual assault charges of a child against me in which all the constitutional rights of the adult are taken away. Not only is the behaviour of Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney in my case good evidence in support of the argument that "strict liability statutes" should be prohibited by the Congress of the United States, but also further proof that Republican presidents are very capable and willing to get their own country men killed, or assassinated as long as it fits their radical agendas.



    June 18, 2007.

    Is this man, Federal Judge Edward C. Prado a crook?

    On the other hand: Was this Federal Judge compelled via Executive Orders signed by “President George Bush Junior” to violate the civil rights of Jesus Alberto Cabal in the United States' District Court for the Western District of Texas?

    The Facts:
  • During the year of 2002, I, Jesus Alberto Cabal filed two law suits in the United States’ District Court for the Western District of Texas located in the city of San Antonio accusing several U.S Attorneys General, and former Directors of the F.B.I of engaging in a massive conspiracy with other officials at the State and Federal levels to violate my civil rights. The charges which among other things described several violations to the Federal laws, 42 U.S.C §1981, §1983, and 42 U.S.C §1985(2) and (3) , also argued that the indictment by the State of Texas against me for the alleged “aggravated sexual assault of a minor” was nothing else than a fabrication, and an act in furtherance of a conspiracy against me initiated by the former Ronald Reagan Administration in the nineteen eighties which was perpetuated throughout the Clinton and Bush Administrations while arguing “Protection of the National Security of the United States”. This of course was a “gimmick” to cover up the tremendous blunder by Mr. Reagan himself in my case, and thereafter to be able to impose a stiff censorship upon the news media to ensure that the American public could never find out the truth.

  • But let’s go back to Judge Edward Prado. Who is he? Well, it turns out Federal Judge Prado is an “ultra conservative” republican lawyer (at least on civil rights matters who believes that most civil rights law suits are "frivolous" in nature ) and who was appointed to the bench at the District Court for the Western District of Texas by former President Ronald Reagan in the nineteen eighties. Folks, what a coincidence it is, that of all the federal judges in such district of Texas, the clerk of the court had to refer or assign to Judge Prado not one but the two (2) law suits that Jesus Alberto Cabal had filed as a result of a conspiracy initiated in the nineteen eighties by no one else than the same President (Ronald Reagan) who appointed him to the bench.

  • In fact, judge Prado dismissed Jesus Alberto Cabal’s civil rights law suit arguing that “I” had purportedly failed to exhaust the remedies before filing a law suit against the Federal Officials at issue. However, Judge Prado did not mention at all, “forgot” that the law suit already contained a copy (or an Addendum) of the “Administrative Claim” that I had already filed with the Department of Justice in Texas during November 24 of 1998 in which I named not only most of the federal officials involved in the Conspiracy at issue, but three (3) former U.S Presidents as well. Unfortunately, the Department of Justice never filed an answer to such document. In this regard, please refer to the sections of this Web Page entitled “DOCUMENTS”, and “EVIDENCE” where all of this proof can be found.

  • This “Administrative Claim” was the pre-condition that federal law required before suing U.S government employees, and that Judge Prado had to know Jesus Alberto Cabal had filed three (3) years earlier with the Department of Justice not only in San Antonio, Texas, but also in Washington D.C. In fact, the actions of Judge Prado were so corrupt and deliberate that after ordering a Motion for Summary Judgment (he) refused to give me a ten (10) days extension to gather the documents needed to prove to him that those requirements had already been fulfilled as mandated by law. (Not that he did not know it already).

  • Furthermore, in what can only be described as adding insult to injury, a few months after unlawfully dismissing my law suits President George Bush Jr. rewarded Judge Edward Prado with a seat in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans, Louisiana; when in fact he should have been impeached for the unlawful rulings in my case. This fact, combined with the appointment of another “ultra conservative republican judge” and “pro-child activist” (Judge Peschall) as the chief judge in the fabricated charges that the state of Texas filed against me for the so called “aggravated sexual assault of a minor” are the “ICING ON THE CAKE”, and probably one of the strongest evidence yet that President George Bush Jr. himself did engage in a criminal conspiracy against me, in total violation of the laws and Constitution of the United States.



  • Add to Google Add to myAOL

     

    -SOME VERY IMPORTANT FACTS ABOUT THE LAW IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS IT APPLIES TO RESIDENT ALIENS.-

  • The United States’ statute 42 U.S.C § 1981, states as follow:

    -EQUAL RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW.-

  • a) “All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishments, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.”


    -DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DURING THE PAST TWO CENTURIES AFFIRMING THE FACT THAT “PERMANENT RESIDENT ALIENS” ARE ENTITLED TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW, TO THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS, AND TO RECEIVE FAIR TRIALS WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.-

  • When Carmen Richardson became a lawfully admitted resident alien, she had every reason to expect the same treatment as any U.S. citizen under the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment. Graham-v-Richardson, 403 U.S. 365, 371; The U.S Supreme Court, Washington, D.C. June 14, 1971.

  • Aliens living in the United States, even though not U.S. citizens, generally enjoy the constitutional and Covenant rights and protections of citizens, including the right to life; freedom from torture, or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; prohibition of slavery; the right to liberty and security of person; the right to humane treatment for persons deprived of their liberty; freedom from imprisonment for breach of contractual obligation; freedom of movement; the right to fair trial; prohibition of ex post facto laws; recognition as a person under the law; freedom from arbitrary interference with privacy, family and home in the United States; freedom of thought, conscience and religion; freedom of opinion and expression; freedom of assembly; and freedom of association. "Aliens, even aliens whose presence in this country is unlawful, have long been recognized as 'persons' guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments," Plyer v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 210 (1982); see also: Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, 344 U.S. 590, 596 (1953).

  • Resident aliens are persons within the protection of the Fifth Amendment and may not be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U.S. 228, 238 (1896).

  • The United States’ Constitution guarantees “Equal Protection under the Law” to all, meaning: citizens as well as aliens. This principle derives from the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee that no state may "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," and the Fifth Amendment's guarantee that "no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," which has been read to incorporate an inalienable "Equal Protection" component. Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954).

  • These constitutional provisions set forth within the 14th, and the 5th Amendments do limit the power of government with respect to all persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction. As interpreted and applied by the United States’ Supreme Court, the doctrine of equal protection applies not only with respect to the rights protected by International Law, and Treaties, but also to the provision of government services and benefits such as education, employment and housing. Nonetheless, the substantive guarantees of the Constitution are often implemented without making reference to the concept of “Equal Protection”.

  • Also, it must be added that “unlawful intentional discrimination” has sometimes been inferred simply from the impact of some state laws, and thereafter the Supreme Court has found that such inference renders the law unconstitutional. For example, in Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), the Supreme Court found impermissible discrimination where all of some 200 Chinese applicants were denied permits to operate laundries while virtually all non-Chinese applicants were granted permits under the same statute.

  • Lastly, it has been settled that the longer an alien has been in the United States and the more legitimate the alien's immigration status, the more equivalent the alien's "Equal Protection Rights" are to those of a U.S. citizen.

  • -THE UNITED NATIONS.-

    Many people do believe that The Headquarters of the United Nations must be moven out of the United States, the sooner the better. This organization embodies the principles of peace, friendship among the nations, and respect for human rights; yet, the Government of the United States of American have become the bully of the world:

  • It is perhaps the most belligerent nation that the world has ever known since the Nazis. It has used nuclear weapons against innocent civilians not once, but twice, something that no one should ever forget.

  • It is a “wholesale violator” of human rights not only with its own citizens, but also in many other areas of the world. It is constantly trying to intimidate members and leaders of this international organization with “economic hardship” unless things are done as “all mighty U.S Government” pleases.

  • The United Nations should be a “leaner and meaner” organization as to ensure total fairness and/or equality among its members. If making meaningful changes to the U.N requires deep cuts within its budget and an end to an out of control bureaucracy so be it, but the world is entitled to have a United Nations organization that functions in a truly impartial manner and therefore earns the respect of its members.

  • There is no doubt that fundamental changes are also needed as to ensure that no nation-member has the power to “veto any resolutions” just because it might interfere with its political agenda. Besides, no country should have a “permanent seat” in the Security Council of the United Nations. This organization should operate as a true “World Democracy”; that is, one country one vote, and all the nations should have a chance to become members of the security council every two or four years as it is done with parliamentary elections in a real democracy.

  • Let’s not forget that there are other truly civilized nations on this earth which could be ideal hosts for this important organization. The nations of the world could probably live in more harmony if some of these changes were implemented……The sooner, the better.

  • -U.S. Democrats: Blowing their chance to regain the presidency in 2008.-

    It appears that the democrats in the United States will not be able to overcome their own history of self deception in what it relates to American politics before the coming presidential election of the year 2008. For some reason they seem to believe that their two front-running candidates namely: “Hillary Clinton” and “Barak Obama” do have a realistic chance to be elected president(s) of the United States in a national election, but the fact of the matter is that they are dead wrong!

  • The first thing the democrats do not seem to understand is that the bulk of the voting population of the United States from a political stand point is “moderate to conservative” which explains the reason why since the year of 1969 republicans have won the white house seven (7) times with only three (3) such victories for the democrats, and since the year 1861 there has been 18 republican presidents, but only 9 democrats.

  • In fact, it is quite fair to say that from a political stand point the United States still lives in the 18th and 19th centuries, for instance: there is a huge racial divide in many areas of the country involving the black population, and just straight out prejudice or racism against minorities in general (which is very bad news for candidate Obama). Also, a large number of voters in the “religious right” movement, including many female voters by the way, do believe that women should not get involved in political issues (this of course, is terrible news for Mrs. Clinton given the fact that the “religious right” do vote in large numbers something that democrats do not usually do). Given these facts we could fairly estimate that it might be another thirty (30) years before a black candidate, a woman, or a latino candidate have a realistic chance of being elected president of the United States, and I would love to be wrong on this one, but I don’t think I am.

  • Moreover, as a whole the political ideology of this country is so "antiquated", and “barbaric” that even nowadays on the 21st century most states of the Union still have the so called “strict liability laws” in which an innocent person falsely accused of a crime is most of the time turned into a criminal by the state because some of these statutes do not allow any defence whatsoever to the charges at issue, and to make things worst the "Rules of Evidence" are not allowed to be enforced in this type of proceedings either. Therefore, such rules become meaningless. It is hard to believe that such savagery and unconstitutionality can exist in the United States of all nations, but it does show the narrow political ideology of most of its people because it is quite evident that the states’ legislatures throughout the country are full of conservative ideologues.

  • Do combine all of the above with the “heavy luggage” that the front runner Mrs. Hillary Clinton will have to carry on going to a general election due to the fact that she is the wife of former president “Bill Clinton” and then her chances of winning in November 2008 become almost none existent.

  • Let’s not forget that for many moderate to conservative Americans Mr. Bill Clinton is a “charlatan” and a “crook”, a man who straight out lied to the people about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, and who was impeached although not removed from office purportedly “to avoid more pain to the nation” according with some well known politicians. As a matter of fact, Mr. Clinton lost his license to practice law in his own state of Arkansas as a direct result of his perjury, and this is probably the main reason why he had to relocate his family to the state of New York after his term in office was over. In a general election when the candidates start to attack each others backgrounds and characters the relationship of the Clintons with the McDougal’s in the “Whitewater scandal” will be reminded once again to the American voters since after all Susan McDougal did choose to spent time in jail as to avoid testifying on matters related to Mr. and Mrs. Clinton and this is something highly suspect in the eyes of many voters, as it shoud be.

  • Let’s face it folks, Democrats in 2008 do have one of the best chances they have had in years of regaining the White House due to all the blunders and serious violations of American and International laws committed by George Bush junior and his gang of thugs; but democrats could just be wasting their chance of taking back the executive branch of government should they continue to encourage Mrs. Clinton’s "ego trip" since her odds of winning will be very slim once the old wounds of her husband’s presidency are reopened during the debates no matter who might be the republican candidate she’ll be facing off. Eventually many voters will conclude that should Hillary Clinton be elected to the presidency, then Bill Clinton somehow will end up having a third term in the White House where he will be able to influence policy matters once again as the former president and husband that he is of Hillary Clinton.

  • In all fairness we could allege that on some issues Mrs. Clinton may have the right message, but without a doubt as a whole she is the “wrong messenger” of the democrats for this coming election. As blunt as it may sound this is something that has to be told and/or discussed before the United States end up with four or eight more years of a republican administration running the country.

  • Statistically for a democrat to be elected president of the United States in 2008 the candidate must be able to carry a considerable number of the “moderate votes” and probably some of the conservatives as well should Ralph Nader decide to enter the final race as an independent candidate. In summary, let’s say that Mrs. Clinton who has her strongest support among liberal democrats could indeed win the democratic party nomination, but it is very doubtful that she will prevail against Rudolph Giuliani or any other republican candidate in a general election, and her odds of winning get even worst once we talk about a third "independent" candidate contesting the presidential race. Do think wisely.


  • August 15, 2008

    -IN SUPPORT OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT-

  • The incursion of Russia into the territory of Georgia this August 8, 2008 must be understood for what it was, that is, a legitimate attempt of the Russian Government to protect the thousands of ethnic Russians, and other non-Georgian ethnic groups left behind after the Soviet Union was dissolved. Those “forgotten” Russians, Abkhazians and Ossetians do appear to be suffering widespread discrimination and oppression at the hands of the Georgian Government probably encouraged by the Bush Administration in the United States which doesn’t want any witnesses sympathetic to Russia in their quest to attract Georgia and other Russian neighbours into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (a.k.a: NATO).

    The arguments set forth by the Administration of the United States claiming that Russia is trying to intimidate neighbouring republics is just a lot of nonsense, and the people of the world should not fall for that simplistic “right wing” rhetoric.

    The position of the United States’ government in this matter is just a plain case of hypocrisy when accusing Russia of invading a neighbour country without a legitimate reason, when in reality the actions of the Georgian government were clearly threatening peace and security along the border of the Russian State.

    To use a common analogy, the claims of the Bush Administration are nothing else than the distorted reality of people who live in “glass houses” casting stones on others. Particularly since the United States itself invaded Iraq in 2003, that as we all know at the time was a sovereign nation which:

  • 1. Is located over 7,000 thousand miles away from the American mainland.

  • 2. It had done absolutely nothing to any Americans citizens, nor challenged the security of the United States in any manner.

  • 3. The U.S removed by force its legitimate elected government which was a member of the United Nations in good standing.

  • 4. Iraq was a country with probably one-tenth the population of the United States and, of more importance from a military point of view, with roughly one-twelfth its per capita income. Let’s not forget either that during the first Gulf War vital infrastructure had already being demolished such as water systems, electrical power plants and related means of distribution, and of course most of its communication towers leaving that nation literally crippled.

  • 5. To make things worst, the U.S military caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians after years of sporadic bombing by the U.S Air force and its “puppet allies” supposedly enforcing a no-fly zone, and a cruel embargo which definitely took countless lives, and,

  • 6. Add to this travesty of justice the lynching of its leader Saddam Hussein, who by the way was a “Sunday School Teacher” when compared with the butchers of Washington George Bush and Dick Cheney. Moreover, contrary to what they (Bush and Cheney) allege there are reasons to believe that Hussein was not turned over to the International Court of Criminal Justice for further proceedings because there was insufficient evidence to obtain a fair conviction against him, and thereafter chose instead to have his enemies prosecute him in what was considered a charade and a mockery of justice by American lawyers who were present during that trial.

  • In fact, it is the United States that throughout its 232 years history has been the “aggressor nation”, the bullies of the world, led mainly by “right wing presidents” who seem to believe that they “own the world” and somehow have self appointed themselves as the good guys when the historic evidence demonstrates exactly the opposite.

    It is widely available in the literature and military records that there are over Four hundred (400) instances from 1800 throughout 2008 in which the United States has used its armed forces abroad in situations of military conflict or just plain unlawful interventions against foreign nations, This is something that no other country in the history of human kind has ever done. In fact, not even the Nazis, nor the Great Greek or Roman empires during the peak of their military power were able to exhibit such outrageous demonstration of belligerence toward other nations of the world as has been done by the United States. There is no nation on any continent of this planet which has not suffered one way or another the imperialist tendencies of the government of the United States of America.

    Among the military interventions throughout its history we can report the following: Eleven (11) times the U.S. has formally declared war against foreign nations. These eleven war declarations encompassed five (5) separate wars, the war with Great Britain declared in 1812, the war with Mexico declared in 1846, the War with Spain declared in 1898, the First World War, during which the U.S. declared war with Germany and with Austria-Hungary during 1917, World War II, during which the U.S. declared war against Japan, Germany, and Italy in 1941, and against Bulgaria, Hungary, and Rumania in 1942.

    Some of these interventions were military engagements that might be considered undeclared wars. These include the undeclared Naval War with France from 1798 to 1800; the First Barbary War from 1801 to 1805; the Second Barbary War of 1815; the Korean War of 1950-53; the Vietnam War from 1964 to 1973; the Persian Gulf War of 1991, and the War with Iraq in 2003. With the only exception of the Korean War all of these conflicts received Congressional authorization falling somehow short of a formal declaration of war. Do add to all of the above almost 400 military deployments with regular troops or mercenaries in just about every country of Latin America, Asia, Africa, and Europe carried out under the excuse to protect U.S. citizens or to promote “the interests of the United States” and you’ll get a frightening picture of what a war mongering nation really looks like.

    With this shady background it is fair to say that the government of Russia must be wary, if not deeply concerned about the United States expanding its military foreign policy close to the borders of the Russian mainland and attempting to place the so called “Missile Defence Shields” a few kilometers away from Moscow. It must be worried as well of the tendencies of the American Administrations to “brain wash” the leaders of the nations of Western Europe into believing that Russia is the enemy when they might in fact be better off abandoning NATO and having a good relationship with the government of this nation.

    In spite of the fact that the United States no longer has the economic muscle “to prostitute the nations of the world” by offering money in exchange for military bases and other not so lawful favours at the expense and suffering of the American citizenry, the Bush Administration don’t seem to care a whole lot about depriving of basic necessities to its people to the point that the United States is beginning to look in many ways like a third world country with a humongous deficit or public debt of ten (10) trillion dollars, an economy in total disarray, and rampant human rights’ abuses in which millions of people have been victimized at the state and federal levels in highly suspect legal proceedings where defendants’ inalienable rights to Due Process and Fair Trial are just stepped upon by the Courts. Such is the case of the so called “strict liability laws” which are some of the most outrageous violations of human rights perpetrated anywhere in the world.

    Now, Russia throughout its 500-year history as a nation has had a few conflicts, but nothing compared to the United States with only 232 years of existence. In fact the Russians have suffered numerous unprovoked invasions and attacks including but no limited to the French with Napoleon, the Mongolians, and by the Nazis under Hitler with millions of Russians lives lost in the process. Therefore, no one can blame this nation for trying to create a “safe zone” around them free of potential invaders or “bully nations” as to protect their national security and legitimate interests. The Russian argument is just plain valid and makes a lot of sense.

    What is worst, this war mongering by the U.S Government might continue into decades to come should another erratic old man like Ronald Reagan be elected president of the United States.
    Such is the case of the presidential candidate John McCain who has managed to portray himself to the electorate as a war hero….But is he really a hero? No way. McCain is a man that during the late 1960s was bombing innocent civilians (women, children, the elderly, and sick people) in the city of Hanoi in an undeclared war of the United States against North Vietnam in which two (2) million people were killed using “carpet bombing” with the infamous B52s, and other aircraft. (Do talk about a candidate for prosecution for crimes against humanity). This is something that might equate McCain’s actions with those of the suicide plane pilots who attacked the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Thus, for many people around the world John McCain is also a Terrorist, a “right wing terrorist” indeed since his actions of the past prove just that. Let’s not forget that in no time McCain seems to have shown any remorse for those terrible deeds committed during the Vietnam War.

    Furthermore, ideologically speaking this man is so off the wall, and erratic that early in 2008 with a big smile on his face he extolled the virtues of killing more innocent civilians, singing “Bomb, bomb Iran” in a mimic of the Beach Boys’ song “Barbara Ann”, and encouraging thereafter potential terrorists to do the same to the American people at a future time since plain common sense dictates that terrorist behaviour breeds more terrorism. If this man is not a “war monger”, and a total liability to the United States in years to come, then, such phrase must be redefined.

    Folks, it is men like George Bush, and John McCain not the Russians who have turned this world into a dangerous place and they do represent what is totally wrong with the United States in the 21st century. These “right wing politicians” are indeed card carrying members of the racket of the American Military-Defence Establishment and are nothing else than the architects of the dangerous direction that the foreign policy of the United States has taken (for the worst), and without a doubt are the guys scaring the heck out of the rational, and straight thinking people of the world.


    July 30, 2007.

    Is N.A.T.O a racist organization?

  • The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was founded in 1949 shortly after the end of World War II, and at the time it was known as the “Atlantic Alliance”. It was a direct response to what the United States and several Western European nations perceived as a direct “Soviet Threat” embodied in the former Warsaw Pact countries also known as the “Iron Curtain”, or putting it in more direct terms the Eastern Europe communist nations led by the Russians. At the time, most Western European nations were deeply concerned by the threat posed by the large numbers of Soviet troops amassed along the border of West Germany. As a direct result, the nations of the “Atlantic Alliance” agreed that an attack on any one of them would be considered an attack against all the members of the alliance by the Soviet Union and its allies. But that was then, and this is now. The truth of the matter is that the Soviet Union ceased to exist in the nineteen nineties, and the same applies to the “Warsaw Pact” nations of Eastern Europe with most of them converted to “free market economies” nowadays.

    Therefore, what’s the real purpose of NATO in the 21st century?

  • Well, it seems very clear to me that with the end of the Soviet Union, of the Warsaw Pact, and the “Cold War” there are no powerful military threats to justify this type of alliance of what is now the most powerful and intimidating “gang” of nations in the history of human kind. Let’s not forget that the main principle for the creation of NATO was to maintain adequate military strength, political unity and to deter aggression plus other forms of military activity in the soviet era; and that principle is now irrelevant. Unfortunately, it appears that the nations of the “North Atlantic Treaty Organization” bored with nothing to do are using its military resources to intimidate the developing nations of the world or what they call “Third World Nations”.

  • The naïve European members of NATO led by the government of the United States which has become the “bully of the world” are now engaged in fighting guerrilla wars mainly in Middle East countries creating mortal enemies that they did not have before. The citizens of Europe are probably less safe nowadays than they were during the Soviet era due to the monumental mistake of following the erratic policies of the government of the United States led by George W. Bush and his attempts to violate the human rights of those he disagrees with, or to oppress the citizens of Islamic nations who may have chosen forms of government incompatible with what the western nations call “Democracy”. Thus, it is fair to say that NATO as an organization is beginning to show “racists overtones”. Let’s just hope the citizens of Europe come to their senses before things get out of hand.



    May 10, 2007.

    The Honorable President of Iran Mahmoud Amadinejhad has expressed a valid argument...

    In what it relates to his country’s need to implement the use of atomic energy. No one can be so naive as to deny that the petroleum based sources of energy could have reached its limits within the next fifty years creating serious economic problems not only for the users of crude, but also for the oil producers. It is very well known that the Iranian government is doing all it can to find new alternative ways of energy for domestic use. In fact, in recent years it has maximized its hydroelectric capacity in an effort to implement efficient and relatively cheap sources of energy, but unfortunately, the fluvial resources of this country are rather limited and not enough to fulfill the high energy demands of a nation which is experimenting considerable technological development.

  • Now, Should the world be worried if Iran develops nuclear technology for peaceful purposes? I do not think so. In fact, the Federal Government of the United States has caused lots of misery in the world with the misuse of the nuclear technology and I do not see or hear of the news media, or any well known political figures in the international community demanding that the Government of the United States be compelled to dismantle its nuclear plants, or the tremendous nuclear arsenal which potentially could wipe out humanity. Particularly, when violent and unstable politicians such as George Bush Jr.are in control of said armaments.

  • Without a doubt there is something that does not fit in the equation when aggressor nations who have already used nuclear weapons to bring destruction to other countries are accountable to no one; yet, small nations who are trying to develop new technologies for peaceful purposes are made out to be "demons" for the political benefit of one or two corrupt leaders who pretend to be the "top dogs" of the world.



    May 07, 2007.

    The Honorable President of Venezuela Hugo Chávez is absolutely right...

    When he states that the Federal Government of the United States led by Mr. George Bush do represent a serious threat to world peace and stability. Mr. Bush does behave as if he had a "monopoly on the absolute truth" and thereafter wields the United States´military and economic powers as if he were "the King of the World".

  • In his rush to intimidate the nations of the world, he shows total disregard and disdain for the opinions of those who disagree with him. Moreover, Mr. George Bush Jr. repeatedly has demonstrated that he is not even concerned for any adverse consequences that his actions could bear on other nations and of the suffering that innocent people may have to endure for his evil actions.

  • Another irony or paradox of Mr. Bush’s presidency is that he is always sending his Secretary of State, a Ms. Condoleezza Rice, to a variety of international forums and organizations to accuse other world leaders of violating human rights; yet, they don’t even dare to touch the subject of the outrageous and brutal violation of human rights perpetrated within their own country against Jesús Alberto Cabal whose case represents the worst violation of human rights committed within the United States during its 230 years of existence, and quite possible is one of the worst violations of human rights anywhere in the world ever.

  • home